Groupware is technology designed to facilitate the work of groups. This technology
may be used to communicate, cooperate, coordinate, solve problems, compete,
or negotiate. While traditional technologies like the telephone qualify as groupware,
the term is ordinarily used to refer to a specific class of technologies relying
on modern computer networks, such as email, newsgroups, videophones, or chat.
Groupware technologies are typically categorized along two primary dimensions:
- whether users of the groupware are working together at the same time ("realtime"
or "synchronous" groupware) or different times ("asynchronous" groupware),
and
- whether users are working together in the same place ("colocated" or "face-to-face")
or in different places ("non-colocated" or "distance").
| |
"synchronous" |
"asynchronous" |
"colocated" |
voting,
presentation support |
shared computers |
videophones,
chat |
email, workflow |
|
"distance" |
|
Several typical groupware applications are described in more detail on our
Groupware Applications page.
CSCW (Computer-Supported Cooperative Work) refers to the field of study which
examines the design, adoption, and use of groupware. Despite the name, this
field of study is not restricted to issues of "cooperation" or "work" but also
examines competition, socialization, and play. The field typically attracts
those interested in software design and social and organizational behavior,
including business people, computer scientists, organizational psychologists,
communications researchers, and anthropologists, among other specialties.
Groupware design involves understanding groups and how people behave in groups.
It also involves having a good understanding of networking technology and how
aspects of that technology (for instance, delays in synchronizing views) affect
a user's experience. All the issues related to traditional user interface design
remain relevant, since the technology still involves people.
However, many aspects of groups require special consideration. For instance,
not only do million-person groups behave differently from 5-person groups, but
the performance parameters of the technologies to support different groups vary.
Ease-of-use must be better for groupware than for single-user systems because
the pace of use of an application is often driven by the pace of a conversation.
System responsiveness and reliability become more significant issues. Designers
must have an understanding of the degree of homogeneity of users, of the possible
roles people play in cooperative work and of who key decision-makers are and
what influences them.
We discuss design issues in significantly more detail on our Groupware
Design Issues page.
Why is groupware design worth paying attention to in the first place?
Groupware offers significant advantages over single-user systems. These are
some of the most common reasons people want to use groupware:
- to facilitate communication: make it faster, clearer, more persuasive
- to enable communication where it wouldn't otherwise be possible
- to enable telecommuting
- to cut down on travel costs
- to bring together multiple perspectives and expertise
- to form groups with common interests where it wouldn't be possible to gather
a sufficient number of people face-to-face
- to save time and cost in coordinating group work
- to facilitate group problem-solving
- to enable new modes of communication, such as anonymous interchanges or
structured interactions
In addition to the benefits of groupware, another good reason to study usability
and design issues in groupware is to avoid a failed design. Groupware is significantly
more difficult to get right than traditional software. Typically, a groupware
system can't succeed unless most or all of the target group is willing to adopt
the system. In contrast, a single-user system can be successful even if only
a fraction of the target market adopts it.
© 1998 Tom Brinck
|